Treasury to recognize tax forms filed by same-sex married couples (Aug 29, 2013)

Treasury to recognize tax forms filed by same-sex married couples

Posted by America News Online
By Peter Schroeder - 08/29/13 02:36 PM ET The Hill

The Treasury Department announced Thursday that it would recognize same-sex married couples as such for tax purposes, even if they live in states that do not.

The new ruling brings more real-world implications to the Supreme Court's June decision to invalidate a key piece of the Defense of Marriage Act, allowing legally married gay couples to exercise the same tax provisions, including income and estate tax provisions, as other married couples.

The plaintiff who brought the challenge to the Supreme Court, Edith Windsor, challenged the law after trying to claim a federal estate tax exemption after her spouse died.

"Today’s ruling provides certainty and clear, coherent tax filing guidance for all legally married same-sex couples nationwide. It provides access to benefits, responsibilities and protections under federal tax law that all Americans deserve," said Treasury Secretary Jack Lew.

"This ruling also assures legally married same-sex couples that they can move freely throughout the country knowing that their federal filing status will not change."

Senior Treasury officials said Thursday that their decision made the most sense administratively, insisting that it would be easier to enforce an across-the-board, nationwide rule.

The change will not apply to domestic partners or civil unions, but legally married gay couples will begin filing 2013 federal income tax returns as either "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately." Same-sex married couples that filed extensions until October on their 2012 returns would have the same option.

Beyond income and estate taxes, the change will impact how same-sex couples approach hundreds of provisions in the tax code, including employee benefits, IRA contributions and claiming earned income and child tax credits.

Same-sex married couples will also have the option of filing amended returns for previous tax years in which they would like to be recognized for tax purposes as married.

Generally speaking, the statute of limitations for filing amended returns is three years from when the return was filed, or two years from when the tax was paid, whichever is later. Same-sex married couples would not have to amend their return if the result caused them to pay more.

Treasury officials said that they thought same-sex married couples would be about as likely to incur either marriage bonuses or penalties as other couples.

Roberton Williams of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center said that a Clinton-era Congressional Budget Office study said that roughly half of couples got a tax benefit from marrying, while 42 percent sustained penalties. Williams added that it was likely that Bush-era tax cuts decreased the number of couples facing penalties.

The Treasury and IRS also announced they planned to set up a streamlined process to allow employers to file refund claims for payroll taxes paid on previously taxed health insurance and other benefits provided to same-sex spouses.

The agencies also plan to issue additional guidance detailing how other tax-favored arrangements should treat same-sex spouses before the change in policy.

"With today’s ruling, committed and loving gay and lesbian married couples will now be treated equally under our nation’s federal tax laws, regardless of what state they call home," said Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin.

"These families finally have access to crucial tax benefits and protections previously denied to them."

But the ruling also sets up other potential hurdles for same-sex couples, especially those who live in states that don’t recognize their marriage. Those couples will likely have to put in more work to file their state returns, which often use a taxpayer’s federal status as a starting point.

Still, the Tax Policy Center’s Williams said – from an economist’s sense – the ruling was the right move, given how frequently taxpayers can shift locations.

“It doesn’t make much sense for a couple’s tax status to change just because they move across state lines,” Williams told The Hill.

--This report was updated at 3:23 p.m



Recent Articles

Florida State Rep. Salzman Denies Threatening Hispanic Group

Conway: Trump Believes NYT Op-Ed Writer ‘Somebody in National Security’

Trey Gowdy Rips Senate Democrats For Kavanaugh Confirmation Antics

Could Trump’s Drug Industry Critiques Be Working? Latest Drug Price Trends Are Good For Americans

Michael Cohen Files To Get His Money Back From Stormy Daniels

Pence denies discussing invoking the 25th Amendment in the Trump White House at any time

Awful. Obama Calls Benghazi a “Wild Conspiracy” — Benghazi Hero Kris Paranto Responds


Why the GOP will likely maintain control of Congress

Trump Is Feuding With Harley-Davidson. Bikers Love Him Anyway.

Newt Gingrich: Anonymous NY Times op-ed is a liberal media attack on President Trump

Regime Change -- American Style

Desperate Democrats

The Supreme Court's days as a super-legislature are over, and Democrats aren't happy about it

China is Losing the New Cold War